|
| |
|
Return to
Corrosion Testing
|
ASTM
F2129 - Electrochemical Corrosion Testing of Surgical Implants
|
| |
|
BACKGROUND
|
|
Six (6) metallic specimens were
submitted for electrochemical evaluation in accordance with ASTM F2129 (Standard
Test Method for Conducting Cyclic Potentiodynamic Polarization Measurements to
Determine the Corrosion Susceptibility of Small Implant Devices.) The surgical
implant materials received were identified as follows:
|
| |
|
TEst procedure |
|
In the electrochemical technique chosen, cyclic
potentiodynamic polarization, a metal specimen (working electrode) is exposed to
the solution in a test cell fitted with a reference electrode (saturated
calomel) and a counter electrode (graphite). The potentiostat is connected to
these three electrodes, and the potential of the working electrode, with respect
to the reference, is scanned through a voltage range from negative to positive,
and then reversed to its starting potential. The resulting current between the
working and counter electrodes is recorded. This scan is then plotted on a
semi-log graph, allowing the resulting curve to be analyzed for key-point
voltages and currents.
|
|
An electrical lead was
connected to each specimen. This lead allowed both electrical connection to the
potentiostat as well as suspension in the test solution. During testing, partial
masking of the specimen was required because of the need to isolate the metal to
metal contact of the lead. This eliminated the possibility of any galvanic
interference.
|
|
Since the specimens submitted
are ultimately to be used in the human body, a phosphate buffered saline
solution (pH 7.4) was used as an electrolyte for testing. The specimens were
tested in the as received condition. Each specimen was inserted in the test
chamber, which was filled with solution, and suspended such that the specimen
remained below the surface of the solution. The end fitted with the test lead
hung just below the liquid/air interface. The cell was allowed to equilibrate
for approximately 1 hour prior to performing the polarization test.
|
|
The conditions used for the
F2129 electrochemical tests were as follows:
|
|
Solution |
Phosphate Buffered Saline
(pH 7.4) |
|
Temperature |
37°C |
|
Agitation |
No |
|
Gas Purge |
150 cc/min. nitrogen |
|
Scan Rate |
0.167 mV per second |
|
RESULTS |
|
The key-point voltage and
current data are summarized in Table 1, and the calculated corrosion rate and
localized attack propensity are presented in Table 2. |
|
|
|
Table 1
Key-Point Electrochemical Data * |
|
Polarization Scan |
Eoc |
Eb |
Ep |
Icorr |
Eb/Ib |
Hysteresis |
|
1 |
5 |
--- |
--- |
0.01 |
--- |
No |
|
2 |
-35 |
--- |
--- |
<0.01 |
--- |
No |
|
3 |
-217 |
430 |
<-317 |
0.03 |
<0.01 |
Yes |
|
4 |
-236 |
377 |
-300 |
0.04 |
<0.01 |
Yes |
|
5 |
-207 |
329 |
<-308 |
0.05 |
<0.01 |
Yes |
|
6 |
-225 |
354 |
-147 |
0.12 |
<0.01 |
Yes |
|
*
NOTE: E-values are in millivolts vs. SCE; and I-values are in
microamperes (10-6 amps) |
|
|
|
Table 2
Corrosion Rates and Localized attack Propensity |
Polarization Scan
|
Corrosion
Rate (mpy) |
Pitting and
Crevice
Propensity |
|
1 |
<0.1 |
Not Likely |
|
2 |
<0.1 |
Not Likely |
|
3 |
<0.1 |
Probable |
|
4 |
<0.1 |
Probable |
|
5 |
<0.1 |
Probable |
|
6 |
<0.1 |
Probable |
|